Another point of contention is the way ACIM has been advertised and commercialized. Because their book, ACIM has spawned a significant business of workshops, seminars, and supplementary materials. Authorities fight that commercialization undermines the religious integrity of the teachings, turning what is proposed to become a holy text right into a profit-driven enterprise. The expansion of ACIM-related items and services has light emitting diode some to issue the motivations behind its promotion and the credibility of those who claim to teach its principles. This industrial element can create a buffer to genuine religious exploration, as people may become more centered on buying the next book or attending another seminar as opposed to participating profoundly with the teachings themselves.

Additionally, the course's emphasis on individual change through a modify in notion is visible as overly easy in addressing complicated social and systemic issues. ACIM places a strong emphasis on particular duty and the ability of your brain to form one's reality. While this can be empowering, it can also result in an application of religious bypassing, where people use  david hoffmeister ideas to avoid confronting difficult facets of their lives or societal injustices. By concentrating generally on changing one's belief, ACIM may neglect the importance of taking concrete actions to deal with social, financial, and environmental challenges. This inward emphasis may lead to an application of isolationism, wherever people become therefore absorbed inside their personal spiritual journey they neglect their responsibilities to the broader community.

The language and type of ACIM also pose a buffer to its availability and acceptance. The text is written in a dense, archaic fashion that mimics the King James Bible, which may be off-putting and difficult to understand for all readers. This complexity can create an aura of mystique and exclusivity round the teachings, which makes it look like just those who are effectively enlightened or focused can understand its meaning. That inaccessibility can perpetuate a hierarchical powerful, where teachers and sophisticated pupils are viewed as owning unique knowledge that's out of take the typical person. Such makeup may foster addiction and inhibit the power of individuals to find their particular spiritual path.

The city of ACIM practitioners also can contribute to the notion of the class as a cult-like movement. The powerful sense of identity and group cohesion among some ACIM supporters can cause an setting wherever dissenting views are not welcomed and wherever critical thinking is discouraged. This can result in a form of groupthink, where people bolster each other's beliefs and understandings of the text without subjecting them to demanding scrutiny. This kind of insular community may be tolerant to additional critique and may build an us-versus-them attitude, more alienating it from popular approval and reinforcing the belief of ACIM as a fringe or cult-like phenomenon.