The broader affect of ACIM on the religious and self-help communities can also be price considering. The course has inspired an important following and has been integrated into different New Era and religious movements. Nevertheless, its impact can be seen as a double-edged sword. On a single hand, it has presented a platform for persons seeking spiritual development and inner peace. On the other hand, their teachings can subscribe to a lifestyle of spiritual bypassing, where individuals use spiritual concepts to avoid coping with particular and social issues. This will lead to an application of escapism, where in actuality the give attention to spiritual ideals distracts from the prerequisite of engaging with and approaching real-world challenges.

Moreover, the industrial success of ACIM and their connected components improves ethical concerns. The proliferation of workshops, books, and seminars centered on ACIM is seen as capitalizing on individuals' religious wants and vulnerabilities. Experts argue that the commercialization of spirituality may lead to the exploitation of seekers, who may possibly spendacim substantial time and income in to practices that eventually don't provide on the promises. This commercialization also can subscribe to the dilution of the course's teachings, as various interpretations and adaptations proliferate, potentially resulting in distress and misapplication of the principles.

Yet another important element to consider could be the exclusivity and dogmatism that may often accompany the ACIM community. As the program itself advances universal enjoy and forgiveness, the way in which it is shown and used by some adherents can cause a feeling of religious elitism. This can produce an "us versus them" attitude, where people who follow ACIM are viewed as enlightened, while those that don't are considered as misguided or unenlightened. Such attitudes may be divisive and detrimental to the course's purported goals of peace and unity. Authorities disagree that correct spiritual growth must foster inclusivity and humility, as opposed to creating a hierarchical difference between the spiritually awakened and the unawakened.

The issue of whether ACIM is "true" fundamentally depends upon one's criteria for truth. From the clinical perspective, the lack of empirical evidence promoting the statements of divine dictation and the course's metaphysical assertions can be grounds for skepticism. From a philosophical viewpoint, the internal inconsistencies and syncretism of ACIM can result in questions about its coherence and plausible validity. From a psychological perspective, the possibility of cognitive dissonance and psychological hardship increases problems in regards to the course's impact on emotional health. And from a functional perspective, the blended benefits noted by practitioners and the prospect of commercialization and exploitation suggest that ACIM's effectiveness and ethical standing are questionable.